A Wide-ranging Criticism of Christian Fundamentalism

Literalists often take the Bible less literally than non-literalist Christians. For example, if you read the story of Adam, Eve, and the serpent in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 2-3) as literally as you can, you will find no story of the Fall of humankind in it. You won't find most of the things literalists claim it says--that God walked in the Garden with Adam and Eve, that they had a close relationship with God, that the serpent was Satan, that they were created immortal and lost their immortality by sinning (disobeying) and that they were also expelled from the Garden directly because of that disobedience, and that when God said they'd die if they ate the fruit he meant "spiritual death."
     In the book I'm writing, I make these points in everyday language and logic. For example, if you were to substitute "cookies" for "the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge" and say to the kids, "On the day you eat any of these cookies, you will surely die," would you mean that they would lose their immortality?
     The book is an extended criticism of Christian fundamentalism. My hope is that it might influence even just a few people to never become fundamentalists. My primary motivation for writing it is to help fight against the Christian Right's efforts to tear down the wall of separation between church and state and Christianize our forefathers and their intentions in ways that are false and self-serving.
     If you would be interested in finding out more about the book or being notified when it is published, please email me at steve.gok2006@gmail.com.
     The book culminates in a chapter with the working title"Christian Fundamentalism in the United States." But leading up to that chapter I explain the folly of Christian fundamentalism from many angels, from interesting tidbits such as the point that the Hebrew Scriptures make no mention of a character with the proper name of Satan or that Adam and Eve were not expelled for what they'd done but for what they might do to more major points that the Gospels were composed anonymously, why neither experiences of Christ nor prophecy fulfillment nor the biblical text can prove that the Bible is the Word of God or that the Gospel is true. The Bible never claims to be the Word of God and, if it did, citing it to prove that it is would be a vacuous argument. In fact, it is quite apparent that the claim that its origins are divine is not divine wisdom, as fundamentalists please themselves to think they preach, but mere human wisdom, if that.
     The decision to read the Bible literally is a decision to interpret it that way and, given everything else we know about myth, the mythic mind, and the development of history-writing by the first century, it would be a pretty silly way to interpret it. But sometimes, when assessing certain fundamentalist Christians claims about what the Bible says or doesn't say, reading certain verses literally can be a useful tool. It can be useful too in showing the emptiness of the liberal bromide that the message of the New Testament boils down to "Love One Another." It says, literally, in about twenty passages, that unless one believes in Christ, one is condemned.
     One of its most important points is that the Bible teaches, in places, that it is okay to challenge God and that one does not necessarily have to do whatever God demands....even that there are times when man must intervene in the affairs of God.

Bible Verses Implying that Jesus was NOT God

It should not be assumed that I take any of the following verses as authoritative. I only submit them because they come from the very book held so dear and holy by those who insist that Jesus was and is God:

Mark 9:37 (plus Matthew 10:40, Luke 9:48, and John 13:20), "Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but him who sent me."

Mark 10:18 "And Jesus said to him, 'Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.' "

Mark 12:29 Jesus said "Here, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord." The words "our God" indicate that Jesus had a higher God over him, a stronger God than him.

Mark 13:32, "But of that day or that hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”

Matthew 7:21 "Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father in heaven."

Matthew 19:17, Jesus responded to one who addressed him as “O good master”, saying: “Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is God.”

Mat 24:36, "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only.

Luke 22:42 "...not my will but Thine be done"

John 5:19, “Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of his own accord, but only what he sees the Father doing; for whatever he does, that the Son does likewise’.”

John 5:30 "I can of myself do nothing. As I hear, I judge; and my judgment is righteous, because I do not seek my own will but the will of the Father who sent me."

John 7:28-29 "...I have not come of myself. I was sent by One who has the right to send, and Him you do not know. I know Him because it is from Him I come; he sent me."

John 7:16 "Jesus said: 'My doctrine is not my own; it comes from Him who sent me.'"

John 8:40 "You are determined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth that I heard from God”

John 8:42 "Jesus said to them, 'If God were your Father, you would love me, for I proceeded and came forth from God; I came not of my own accord, but He sent me.' "

John 8:50 "And I do not seek my own glory; there is One who seeks and judges."

John 10:29 "My Father is greater than all."

John 14:10, “The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own authority; but the Father who dwells in me does his works.”

In John 14:28, Jesus says, “The Father is greater than I.”

John 15:2 "My Father takes away every branch in me that bears not fruit; he purges it; that it may bring forth more fruit." Here, we see Jesus' acknowledgement that he is an impefect sinner just like the rest of us; he too must be purged and purified.

John 20:17, Jesus tells Mary Magdalene to tell his followers: “I ascend unto my Father and your Father; and to my God and your God.”

1 Timothy, 2:5, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”

Intelligent Designers & Creators

Just the fact that the prostate gland surrounds the urethra, that it usually swells in old age thus putting pressure on the urethra and making it difficult to urinate shows a lack of Intelligent Design. But I want to focus here on the common, philosophical argument for an Intelligent Designer or for God. In the history of philosophy, it is called "The Argument from Design." It goes something like this: "The world is so complex and so beautiful and organized that there just has to be a God!" or, more recently, "....there must have been an Intelligent Designer behind it all!" The problem for any believer in a Bible-based religion who uses this argument is that it does not prove the existence of the biblical God. In the 18th Century David Hume wrote a book called "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" in which he showed why the argument just can't get you from your awe over the beauty and complexity of nature to the existence of the Lord God of the Bible: even if it did prove that there is intelligence behind the creation, it would fall short of telling you if that intelligence was the biblical or some other god. It leaves open the possibility that the designer and the creator were not one and the same or that there were two or more of each. It can't tell you if the intelligence(s) behind the creation were perfect or good or just or all-knowing or omnipresent or whether it (or they) practices "hard love" or ever incarnated as a Jewish tekton (the Greek word most folks mistakenly take to mean carpenter). It can't tell you whether or not the creation was assigned by God as a joke to a committee of adolescent gods or for some other reason. 
     Personally, although I can't support any particular belief about divinity, I've found myself most at home  with Hindu conceptions of it. They resemble Christian theologian Paul Tillich's idea that God is not a being at all but the ground of all being. Historian of religion Karen Armstrong seems to confer. I myself have no conception of it, however easily I'm able to slip into the role of Tevya (in "Fiddler on the Roof") and treat God as someone I could have a casual conversation with. In the end, it is, for me, just mystery